1 comment
  Email this

  

Posted on Tuesday, March 25th, 2008 18:28:44 GMT by: agentorange
Posted under: movie review horror

Year: 2006
Director: Simon Rumley
Writers: Simon Rumley
IMDB: link
Trailer: link
Amazon: link
Review by: agentorange
Rating: 8.5 out of 10

Simon Rumley’s The Living and the Dead was scarier and harder for me to watch than any horror film I’ve ever seen. A frank and often gut wrenching exploration of mental illness and the frailties of the human spirit, it is all shown through the unflinching eye of kitchen sink realism (something the Brits do better than anyone) which manages to up the film’s squirm factor by 10 and fill the mind with anxiety like you wouldn’t think possible. But is The Living and The Dead really a “horror” film as the marketing would have you believe? Well, not in the strictest sense no. With none of the usual manipulations of style or storytelling we’ve become accustomed to in the genre I’d say the film is much more of a dysfunctional family drama; but terrifying none the less. “Terror by good intentions” indeed.





The story is as follows: The Brocklebank family lives within the skeletal remains of Longleigh House, a once beautiful royal manor that now lies derelict due to years of neglect and the continual fading of the British Royal class. Mrs. Brocklebank is ill and is often tended to by her husband as well as a nurse from London. But when their son, the mentally challenged and delusional James, finds himself alone for a day he decides he's capable of looking after his mother by himself. Desperate to make his father proud and his mother well again, James inadvertently terrorizes the people he loves the most by doing what he thinks is right.





As previously stated, the film's style is unflinching to the point where I'd say the only thing more shocking than the subject matter of the film is how well it's been made. The acting is amazing across the board, with Leo Bill (who the ladies may remember as John Warren from Becoming Jane) turning in one of the best performances of the last couple of years as The Brocklebank's handicapped son. And personally I usually hate the characterization of mentally challenged people in films, but every action of Bill's performance runs the gamut from hysterical to nuanced so that it becomes frighteningly real.

But I also think that Rumley's done something else with The Living and the Dead that's been missed by many critics and viewers. The film is also (and all you Brits out there please feel free to chime in on this one) very much a treatise on the decline in contemporary relevance of the British Royal class. The characters seem strangely dislocated and forgotten, as if the Brockleback's are fighting to hold onto their family dignity in the face of a dying bloodline. But this isn't anything I thought of until after watching the film. It certainly isn't presented overtly.





I can see why this film has received the praise it has over the past year. It's a pretty amazing and visceral experience that never lets up the tension for a minute. However it is also a film that's not for the faint of stomach, and certainly not a rollicking good time at the movies.

Related articles

Review of the best kids flick since the 80s THE SUBSTITUTE (Vikaren)

Posted on Thursday, October 9th, 2008 14:01:14 GMT by: agentorange |   8 comments

NY Horror Film Fest: Review of the lawless horror film BAD BIOLOGY

Posted on Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 3:57:18 GMT by: Bob Doto |   0 comments

Review Roundup: Films we watched in March 2009

Posted on Wednesday, April 8th, 2009 17:58:35 GMT by: agentorange |   0 comments

Review of Jonathan Liebesman's THE KILLING ROOM

Posted on Thursday, August 13th, 2009 2:50:33 GMT by: agentorange |   3 comments

Review of French horror sequel LADY BLOOD

Posted on Wednesday, August 26th, 2009 19:08:52 GMT by: The Crystal Ferret |   0 comments

FRIGHTFEST 09: Review of Troll 2 documentary BEST WORST MOVIE

Posted on Saturday, August 29th, 2009 22:33:55 GMT by: Ben Austwick |   2 comments