The UHF of the film world.
Latest news

Christopher Webster [Celluloid 03.16.10] post apocalyptic movie review cyberpunk scifi thriller



Year: 2009
Directors: Ivan Engler / Ralph Etter
Writers: Ivan Engler / Patrick Steinmann / Thilo röscheisen
IMDB: link
Trailer: link
Review by: agentorange
Rating: 8.2 out of 10

[Editor's note: Cargo is having its North American premier at SXSX 2010 tomorrow night. Be there, or be square.]

Those of you worried that Cargo will turn out to be just another Alien clone are going to be happy by the end of this review. Because, despite what the marketing for the film may have us believe, Cargo is not the typical space-station horror you might be expecting. It is a much grander work than that, blending classic scifi ideas about the destiny of humanity with massive visual scope and confident direction from first-time feature directors Ivan Engler and Ralph Etter. In short, Switzerland has not only produced its first large scale science fiction film, but one that showcases enough smarts and skill that it ranks among scifi cinema's best.


In all honestly I was completely taken aback when the first act of Cargo started to play. I knew Engler's budget was a mere fraction of what Neil Blompkamp had for District 9 and even less than Duncan Jones had for Moon, so where were all these massive Blade Runner by way of anime shots coming from? I expected the film to be peppered with the odd establishing shot here and there to give the illusion of scope beyond the frame, but in Cargo epic shots keep coming and coming and coming. And just when you think the film can't get any bigger, Engler and Etter set their entire 15 minute climax in space, outside a HUGE space station. And the VFX shots are truly staggering, competing with anything coming out of Hollywood. You can see the production crew's sleepless nights up on the screen and it is this kind of sheer ambition that makes Cargo such a rewarding viewing experience.



So, if Cargo isn't a monster movie, or really even a horror movie, then what's it all about? well, it feels more like a mystery than a straight up thriller. There are certainly moments of eerie suspense and a couple of decent action beats, but it never truly crosses over into "scary movie" territory. Some viewers might consider this a flaw in the film, but I think the Cargo crew would rather have this film lumped into the "smart scifi" genre and so the film plays more like Blade Runner, Solaris, Soylent Green, Moon or Sunshine than Event Horizon or Alien.

*** POSSIBLE SPOILER WARNING ***


Essentially, the human race is in a bad way. The earth is dying and quickly becoming uninhabitable. Massive space stations the size of multiple cities are orbiting the earth, but even these can't accommodate earth's refugees. Disease, pollution and a new terrorist group is quickly making life on the stations unbearable.

Those lucky enough to be rich or win the travel lottery, are able to find passage to RHEA, a new colony set up on another planet. Otherwise space travel is just too long and too expensive for everyone to go. No "light speed" here folks.

Enter Cargo's female protagonist, Laura Portamnn, a doctor who takes a position on an eight-year cargo mission delivering building materials to the unmanned "Station 42" to make enough money to go to RHEA and reunite with her sister. Most of her time on the mission will be spent in cryosleep, but each crew member is required to spend a certain amount of time awake to make sure the peice of crap ship stays together during the mission.



Three and a half years into the mission it is Laura's turn to live alone on the freaky space freighter and weird stuff starts happening. Eventually there is a malfunction in the cargo hold and Laura wakes the other members up to investigate. When they realize that the malfunction was sabotage, they begin to uncover that their cargo is part of a major conspiracy to control the human population by whatever means necessary (don't worry, Soylent Green isn't people here gang) and that someone is willing to kill to keep it hidden.

Cargo is a classic dystopian epic. It nails the look and feel of a world that's falling apart at the seams. It's certainly gritty and realistic. The ship is a piece of crap where stuff's always breaking down. Space travel is long, boring, expensive and hella cold and the crew loves to complain about it. In fact it's so cold that there's even snow in the the cargo hold.

Technology in the Cargo world seems to be extremely advanced, and we see a lot of gadgets and body manipulations throughout the film. However, unlike other scifi films which tend to gloss over the issue to light years, even though you can send electronic messages to other stations or planets, it takes years to get a message in return.



At the center of the film is the ship's Cargo hanger, so large it's like another world - metallic and deadly - where "railings don't exist" (a space opera pre-requisite once uttered by George Lucas). Entering the hanger is strictly prohibited and when the crew goes in you can see why. It's pretty darn treacherous making your way through the maze of moving house-sized containers. Two of the film's most unique sequences take place in the hanger and the execution is simply great.

I wanted to make sure to mention the film's score, because it's Fredrik Strömberg's first time out of the gate and it's simply astounding. Haunting, beautiful and sumptuous, it marries the film's visuals and really elevates Cargo to a classic status.

But of course, as no film is perfect... I've seen Cargo three times now and despite how much I love the film for it's story, acting, production design, music and cinematography, I think that Engler and Etter could have cranked up the horror factor a bit to give the film a more immediate sense of peril. There are a couple of kills in the film, but because they happen fast and you see none of the violence you don't feel the threat level rise as much as you should.

That said, I know Engler wrote a few drafts of the film. One was much more violent, but it was toned down in favour of putting emphasis on the film's scifi elements. Since Cargo isn't meant to be a horror film I can see the logic, but still, a little more of the ol' ultra-violence to turn the screws a little would have made the experience that much more engaging.

Despite this minor quibble, I think Cargo is primed to stun viewers who won't be expecting its unique story, confident direction and striking visuals. I certainly wasn't.

The film is definitely in the same league as any of the latest scifi films we've been loving like MOON or Sleep Dealer and I hope everyone gets a chance to see it.

You might also like

avatar

Lotus Eater (9 years ago) Reply

Smells of ass kickery.

cant wait to see.

avatar

perkules (9 years ago) Reply

Dystopian epic sounds awesome, but since I don't expect it to premier in any local cinema, please keep us posted on it's dvd release... (on any region!)

avatar

agentorange (9 years ago) Reply

You know it perkules. We'll let everyone know when cargo sees a wide release, whether in theatres or on DVD/Blu-ray

avatar

. (9 years ago) Reply

Multiple cities in space supporting humanity of a dying Earth? Sounds like Wall.E

avatar

Anonymous (9 years ago) Reply

too bad the vfx crew are still waiting to be paid by the producer... sad.

avatar

louis (9 years ago) Reply

This will be the closing night film at SCI-FI-LONDON on 3rd May.

avatar

Tue Sorensen (9 years ago) Reply

There is a German DVD out (available thru Amazon.de), but sadly it doesn't have English subtitles (despite the sales page claiming that it does! I ordered it, so I know.)

avatar

Anonymous (9 years ago) Reply

At this moment I have the DVD in my computer and the English subtitles work.

avatar

jbs (9 years ago) Reply

I saw this film on a Swiss flight to NY in March and was very impressed. It would have been great to see on a big screen!

avatar

HD (8 years ago) Reply

You have hit the nail on the head with this review. I didn't get my hopes up when sliding this disc into the dvd player, having been disappointed by less mainstream sci-fi before. However, my fears were unfounded... what a gem. The external shots are visually stunning with a sense of scale and realism reminiscent of the EVA sequences from 2010 (The Year We Make Contact). I've read less enthusiastic folk nit-picking about small details of this film, but for me it was a breath of fresh air from most of the predicatable, populist tripe that Hollywood pumps out these days. Bravo chaps, more please!...

avatar

Moraiarty (6 years ago) Reply

As an avid sci-fi fan I can tell you that the first 2/3rds of this movie is beautiful and atmospheric but this film rapidly descends into a cliched, predictable plot with some horrible, HORRIBLE dialogue and one sappy ending.

avatar

Rob (5 years ago) Reply

I agree. I really enjoyed the film on the whole but the ending did take the edge off of an otherwise excellent film.

avatar

Wolf (5 years ago) Reply

So.... yes, it's grand in sheer scale, and visually impressive, with a slight taste (albeit stale) of Matrix....however, it was by and large plodding, predictable and anticlimactic. As far as ranking in scifi's top cinema? Not by a long shot. It has elements that could have made it so, but dialog and sloth like pace dooms it to the $5 Bargain Discount bin

avatar

Luis Peres (4 years ago) Reply

Excellent review for an incredible and solid sci-fi movie which also caught me totattaly by surprise some years ago.
If you like this, get the blu-ray because the sound and image quality are out of this world.


Leave a comment